Waters Corp. Stock
Waters Corp. Stock
We can see a decrease in the price for Waters Corp.. Compared to yesterday it has lost -€3.400 (-1.140%).
Currently there is a rather negative sentiment for Waters Corp. with 0 Buy predictions and 3 Sell predictions..
A slightly negative potential of -16.56% at a current price of 303.2 € for Waters Corp. is the result of a target price of 253 €.
Pros and Cons of Waters Corp. in the next few years
Pros
?
W********* I********* f** t** n*** y****
?
M***** P*******
?
B****
Cons
?
S********** s********
?
C******** o* t** e**********
?
G***** c******* t* c**********
Tell us your opinion to access the 'Wisdom of the Crowds'
Performance of Waters Corp. vs. its peers
Security | Change(%) | 1w | 1m | 1y | YTD | 3y | 5y |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Waters Corp. | -1.140% | 4.264% | -1.718% | 12.296% | 0.397% | 16.615% | 60.746% |
Boston Scientific | -0.730% | 1.481% | 7.874% | 46.461% | 33.165% | 93.284% | 107.576% |
Illumina Inc. | -2.730% | -9.055% | -11.060% | -42.117% | -18.397% | -66.785% | -63.406% |
Resmed Inc. | -1.590% | 0.200% | 15.294% | -4.470% | 28.166% | 25.249% | 98.714% |
Comments
Waters Co. (NYSE: WAT) had its price target raised by analysts at Barclays PLC from $275.00 to $300.00. They now have an "underweight" rating on the stock.
Show more
Ratings data for WAT provided by MarketBeat
Waters Co. (NYSE: WAT) had its price target raised by analysts at Barclays PLC from $230.00 to $275.00. They now have an "underweight" rating on the stock.
Show more
Ratings data for WAT provided by MarketBeat
Waters Co. (NYSE: WAT) was downgraded by analysts at Barclays PLC from an "equal weight" rating to an "underweight" rating. They now have a $230.00 price target on the stock, down previously from $270.00.
Show more
Ratings data for WAT provided by MarketBeat
News
Why Victoria's Secret Stock Plummeted Today
Shares of Victoria's Secret (NYSE: VSCO) plummeted 29.7% on Thursday after the lingerie, clothing, and beauty-products retailer announced reasonably solid quarterly results but followed with